Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version. Compare with Current  |   View Page History
Title
IS45 Audio and Video Recordings Missing Important Metadata
Detailed description The Danish State and University Library (SB) holds large collections of Radio and TV Broadcasts.

The radio broadcast files are WAV (22.05khz, 16 bit). The file duration of the testbed files is approximately 20 minutes to 10.5 hours. This means some recordings cover a number of shows. The metadata of the files are Radio Channel ID, start time and end time (part of file names). The SB also has the program listings in a different collection. There is however no link between recordings and program information.

The mpeg-2 video with Danish TV broadcasts in the testbed dataset are approximately 20 minutes to 17 hours, containing a number of shows. The metadata of the files are TV Channel ID, start time and end time (part of file names). The SB also has the program listings in a different collection. There is however no link between recordings and program information.

The mpeg-1 video with Danish TV broadcasts in the testbed dataset are approximately 10 minutes to 16 hours, again containing a number of shows. The metadata of the files are TV Channel ID, start time and end time (part of file names). The SB also has the program listings in a different collection. There is however no link between recordings and program information.

(Note the [mpeg-2 transport stream with Danish TV broadcasts] are one hour recordings. These also contain metadata on the shows being sent.)

DRAFT
Scalability Challenge
What requirements are placed on the solution in terms of the SCAPE scales of scalability: content size, volume of content, complexity of content
Issue champion Who owns the issue? Identify the owner with a link to their contact page on the SCAPE Sharepoint site, as well as identifying their institution in brackets. Eg: Schlarb Sven (ONB). Also note what the role of the Issue Champion is within their organisation.
Other interested parties
Any other parties who are also interested in applying Issue Solutions to their Datasets. Identify the party with a link to their contact page on the SCAPE Sharepoint site, as well as identifying their institution in brackets. Eg: Schlarb Sven (ONB)
Possible Solution approaches Brief brainstorm of possible approaches to solving the Issue. Each approach should be described in a single sentence as part of a bulleted list. Note that actual Solutions will be owned by the Solution Provider who should be a different person from the Issue Champion. Reaching a satisfactory conclusion for the Issue should be considered a team effort between these parties.
Context Details of the institutional context to the Issue. (May be expanded at a later date)
Lessons Learned Notes on Lessons Learned from tackling this Issue that might be useful to inform the development of Future Additional Best Practices, Task 8 (SCAPE TU.WP.1 Dissemination and Promotion of Best Practices)
Training Needs Is there a need for providing training for the Solution(s) associated with this Issue? Notes added here will provide guidance to the SCAPE TU.WP.3 Sustainability WP.
Datasets
  • [WAV with Danish Radio broadcasts, ripped audio CD’s, and SB in-house audio digitization]
  • [SP:mpeg video with Danish TV broadcasts]
Solutions Reference to the appropriate Solution page(s), by hyperlink

Evaluation

Objectives Which scape objectives does this issues and a future solution relate to? e.g. scaleability, rubustness, reliability, coverage, preciseness, automation
Success criteria Describe the success criteria for solving this issue - what are you able to do? - what does the world look like?
Automatic measures What automated measures would you like the solution to give to evaluate the solution for this specific issue? which measures are important?
If possible specify very specific measures and your goal - e.g.
 * process 50 documents per second
 * handle 80Gb files without crashing
 * identify 99.5% of the content correctly
Manual assessment Apart from automated measures that you would like to get do you foresee any necessary manual assessment to evaluate the solution of this issue?
If possible specify measures and your goal - e.g.
 * Solution installable with basic linux system administration skills
 * User interface understandable by non developer curators
Actual evaluations links to acutual evaluations of this Issue/Scenario
Labels:
None
Enter labels to add to this page:
Please wait 
Looking for a label? Just start typing.