Resolution not in expected header fields

compared with
Current by Johan van der Knijff
on May 07, 2013 16:26.

(show comment)
Key
This line was removed.
This word was removed. This word was added.
This line was added.

Changes (2)

View Page History
h3. Upcoming changes to the standard

An amendment to the standard (ISO/IEC 15444-1:2004/AMD6) -is in preparation- has been published which -will-, among other things, includes a more specific description of the resolution fields and their intended use. This should clear up most confusion about this in the future. See also the following [blog post by Rob Buckley|http://jpeg2000wellcomelibrary.blogspot.com/2011/04/guest-post-color-in-jp2.html], and the [August 2011 draft of the amendment|http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc29/open/29view/29n12288t.doc].


[Van der Knijff, J.M. JPEG 2000 for Long-term Preservation: JP2 as a Preservation Format. D-Lib Magazine Volume 17, Number 5/6. May 2011 |http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may11/vanderknijff/05vanderknijff.html]
[ISO/IEC 15444-1:2004/PDAM 6. Updated ICC profile support, bit depth and resolution clarifications. Draft, August 2011.|http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc29/open/29view/29n12288t.doc]
[T.800 : Updated ICC profile support, bit depth and resolution clarifications|http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-T.800-201303-P!Amd6/en]