View Source

h2. Further Reading\\

Beagrie, N et al (2008) _Digital Preservation Policy Study_. JISC Report, Retrieved May 12, 2014, from [|]  

The National Archives (2011) _Digital Preservation Policies:  Guidance for Archives,_ Retrieved May 12, 2014, from [|]

Sierman et al ( 2014) An overview of published preservation policies used for this Catalogue Retrieved May 12, 2014, from []


h4. *[Authenticity|1. Guidance Policy Authenticity]*

APARSEN Project (2012),  _D24.1 Report on Authenticity and Plan for Interoperable Authenticity Evaluation System_.  Retrieved May 12, 2014,from  [|]\\


h4. *[Bit Preservation|2. Guidance Policy Bit Preservation]*

APARSEN project (2012). _D22.1 Persistent Identifiers Interoperability Framework_. Retrieved May 12, 2014 from [|]

National Stewardship Alliance (2014), _Levels of Preservation._ Retrieved May 12, 2014 from [|]

Rosenthal, D.S, (2010),  Bit Preservation: A Solved Problem?” , _International Journal of Digital Curation Vol 5, No 1_, 2010. [doi:10.2218/ijdc.v5i1.148|] []

Zierau, EM (2011): _A Holistic Approach to Bit Preservation._ (Doctoral dissertation). Available from []_df _ 

Zierau, EM, (2012(: _Hvordan sikrer man, at data forbliver uskadte og læsbare over tid,_ , [] (in Danish)


h4. *[Functional Preservation|3. Guidance Policy Functional Preservation]*

The Parliamentary Archives (2009) _Digital Preservation Policy_ London, UK: Houses of Parliament, Retrieved May 12, 2014 from [|]                 

Trusted Repository Audit and Certifcation (2007): _Criteria and Checklist._ Retrieved May 12, 2014 from [|]

Wikipedia Definition of functional preservation (2014) :Retrieved May 12, 2014 from:  [|]

Zierau, E (2012) : _Hvordan sikrer man, at data kan fortolkes og forstås over tid_, Retrieved May 12, 2014 from  [|] (in Danish)


h4. {color:#000000}*[Digital Object|4. Guidance Policy Digital Object]*{color}

{color:#333333}Charlesworth A (2012),{color} {color:#333333}{_}Intellectual Property Rights and Preservation._{color} {color:#333333} DPC Technology Watch Report 12-02. {color}{color:#333333}[|]{color}{color:#333333}:{color}

The National Archives (2011) _Guide 8 Disposal of records_ London, UK: The National Archives. Retrieved May 12, 2014 from                                [|] 


h4. *[*Metadata*|SP:5. Guidance Policy Metadata]*

Danish website giving advice about Digital Preservation (in Danish) Retrieved May 12, 2014 from [|]  Note section +[+|]+  on Metadata specifically

Information on Domain Metadata Standards provided by the DCC. Retrieved May 12, 2014 from [|]

Gartner, R. (2008)  _Metadata for digital libraries: state of the art and future directions v1.0_, JISC Technology & Standards Watch. Retrievd May 12, 2014 from [|]

Lavoie, B. & Gartner, R. (2013) _Preservation _{_}Metadata __(2nd edition). _UK_: _DPC Technology Watch Report 13-03  [|]  (See also [First Edition, (05-01 2005)|]

METS Standard. Retrieved May 12, 2014 from {color:#333333}[|]{color}

Premis Data Dictionary version 2.1 Retrieved May 12, 2014 from ??{*}{??}premis{??}{*}??/v2/??{*}{??}premis{??}{*}??\-??{*}{??}2{??}{*}??\-0.pdf??‎ 

Riley, J. (2010) Poster on : _Seeing Standards: A Visualization of the Metadata Universe_ Retrievd May 12, 2014 from [|]

Riley, J. (2010) Glossary of Metadata Standards. Retrieved May 12, 2014 from [|]

Significant Properties of Digital Objects, webpage refers to reports on specialised areas [|]

Webb, C. , Pearson, D. and  Koerbin, P.  ( National Library of Australia) (2013) _'Oh, you wanted us to preserve that?\!' Statements of Preservation Intent for the National Library of Australia's Digital Collections. _ D-Lib, vol 19, issue 1-2. {color:#2b538e}doi:10.1045/january2013-webb{color}

h4. {color:#000000}*[Access|8. Guidance Policy Access]*{color}

APARSEN Project (2014) _D31.1 Report on DRM Preservation._  Retrieved May 12, 2014 from  []

CASPAR project (2007) \_D2301:  Report on OAIS Access Model  _Retrieved May 12, 2014 from [|]

h4. {anchor:FurtherReadingRights}

h4. {color:#000000}*[Rights|6. Guidance Policy Rights]*{color}

APARSEN Project (2014) _D31.1 Report on DRM Preservation._  Retrieved May 12, 2014 from  []

BlogForever Project (2013): _Development of the Digital Rights Management Policy_, Retrieved May 12, 2014 from [|]

Rights management metadata [ODRL|] (Open Digital Rights Language) can be a useful standard, [|].

Technical metadata e.g. the standard MIX (for images) could be used, [|].    


h4. {color:#000000}*[Standards|7. Guidance Policy Standards]*{color}

McGovern, N (ed) (2012) _Aligning national approaches in Digital Preservation,_ Altlanta USA: Educopia. retrieved May 12, 2014 from_ \_[|]
Overview of standards is also published by the EU-project Digital Cultural Heritage Roadmap for Preservation (DCH-RP) (2013)  : [Standards and interoperability|],  

h4. {anchor:FurtherReadingOrganisation}

h4. {color:#000000}*[Organisation|9. Guidance Policy Organisation]*{color}

4C is a  project concerned with digital preservation costs. Website: [|]

Digital Curator Vocational Education Europe Project (DigCurV) has resources about staffing on their website [|]

Digital Preservation Coalition (2014) _Digital Preservation Business Case Toolkit. _Retriebed May 12, 2014 from [][]

DRAMBORA is an approach to digital risk analysis. Website [|]


h4. {color:#000000}*[Audit and Certification|10. Guidance Policy Audit and Certification]*{color}

Data Seal of Approval website for repository certification ( [][])

ISO standard 16363 on Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories, verson available from  ([|])

Primary Trustworthy Digital Repository Authorisation Body (PTAB) website which provides information on preparing for an audit ( [])

Nestor Seal  for Trustworthy Repositories based on DIN 31644 (2013) which has the criteria for trustworthy digital archives, []